Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlatartseva, E.en
dc.contributor.authorBarysheva, Galina Anzelmovnaen
dc.identifier.citationAlatartseva, E.. Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects [Electronic resource] / E. Alatartseva, G. A. Barysheva // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences . — 2015 . — Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia . — [P. 36-42] .en
dc.description.abstractThe subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society. Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: 1) one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); 2) an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; 3) one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; 4) the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category “well-being” gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the “formula” of the well-being of human and society.en
dc.relation.ispartofProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 166: Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia, 2015.en
dc.subjectsubjective well-beingru
dc.subjectsustainable developmentru
dc.subjecthuman developmentru
dc.subjecthuman societyru
dc.subjectsocio-economic aspectsru
dc.subjectmoral-psychological aspectsru
dc.subjectсубъективное благополучиеru
dc.subjectустойчивое развитиеru
dc.subjectчеловеческое обществоru
dc.subjectсоциально-экономические аспектыru
dc.titleWell-being: Subjective and Objective Aspectsen
dc.typeConference Paperen
local.departmentНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)::Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ)::Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)ru
local.conference.nameInternational Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Материалы конференций

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat,31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.