Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35417
Title: Outline of Synthesis of Cognitive and Socio-cultural Foundations of Scientific Knowledge Evolution in Research Programs of Western Philosophy of Science
Authors: Kornienko, Anna Anatolievna
Keywords: cognitive sociology of science; context; constructivism; deconstructivism; criteria of scientific content; sociality in science; interpretation; контексты; конструктивизм; деконструктивизм; научные знания; исследовательские программы; западная философия
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Kornienko, Anna Anatolievna. Outline of Synthesis of Cognitive and Socio-cultural Foundations of Scientific Knowledge Evolution in Research Programs of Western Philosophy of Science [Electronic resource] / A. A. Kornienko // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences . — 2015 . — Vol. 166 : Proceedings of The International Conference on Research Paradigms Transformation in Social Sciences 2014 (RPTSS-2014), 16–18 October 2014, Tomsk, Russia . — [P. 387-392] .
Abstract: The article analyses the development of cognitive sociology of science, in the object field of which connection of cognitive and social structures of science is traced. The role of context in scientific knowledge formation is defined. It is stated that the basis for development of research program of cognitive sociology of science appeared to be reconsideration of the standard concept of science as a complex of gnoseological, epistemological and methodological interpretations of nature and morphology of the produced scientific knowledge, methods for its explanation and scientificity ideals. The difference between "strong" and «weak» varieties of scientific knowledge evolution, developed in western philosophy of science, is considered. "Social studies of science" are reviewed as a form of social constructivism and relativism, exhibiting their specific nature in macro-analytical and micro- analytical strategies of scientific knowledge evolution analysis. The thesis that multidimensionality of science cannot be adequately interpreted focusing only on conceptual history of science is proved.
URI: http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/35417
Appears in Collections:Материалы конференций

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
dx.doi.org-10.1016-j.sbspro.2014.12.541.pdf295,84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.